Enhancing road safety with the infrastructure-adaptable NDBA 2.0 concrete median barrier: An Italian experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2024.1bp10d20Keywords:
concrete safety barrier, road safety, full-scale crash test, road transport, road engineeringAbstract
Road safety is a crucial global concern because of the high number of fatalities and injuries resulting from road crashes each year. Median crossover collisions are among the most dangerous crashes that happen on highways, frequently leading to serious or fatal injuries. The main approach to decreasing the occurrence of these types of crashes is the installation of median barriers. When the need for such installations arises, road agencies must choose from various options, including concrete barriers, cable barriers, or metal-beam guardrails. This paper is dedicated to the New Dynamic Barrier for Highways (NDBA 2.0), an innovative technology for median barriers developed by the Italian National Road Agency (ANAS), emphasizing its pivotal role in enhancing road safety. It incorporates high-tensile steel and advanced composites, offering robust protection while maintaining a lightweight profile. What distinguishes the NDBA 2.0 is its dynamic nature, featuring an intelligent system that seamlessly adapts to the road infrastructure. Its modular construction, with sections of only 200 cm, allows for easy installation and ensures compatibility across successive road segments. This adaptability reduces construction time while maintaining the highest standards of performance. From a road safety perspective, the NDBA 2.0 offers substantial advantages. Its design contributes to minimizing crash-related costs by reducing the severity of crashes, particularly in the transition zones. The barrier's design allows it to adapt to varying road conditions and traffic volumes, effectively addressing common installation challenges on existing roadways as well. Its ability to be directly supported on the road surface wear layer eliminates the need for costly foundation structures, facilitating quick installation and reducing maintenance expenses. The NDBA 2.0 barrier was designed to eliminate the need for future simulations in the design and verification of transitions between different barriers. For this reason, the NDBA 2.0 barrier has been tested in real-world conditions in class H4 and, consequently, is equipped with CE marking. This study offers a comprehensive analysis of the NDBA 2.0 barrier, whose implementation may provide significant benefits for road safety. Continued research, collaboration, and widespread adoption of the NDBA 2.0 barrier can further enhance road safety on a global scale.
References
1. Ambros, J., Altmann, J., Jurewicz, C., & Chevalier, A. (2019). Proactive assessment of road curve safety using floating car data: An exploratory study. Archives of Transport, 50(2), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.5570
2. Bareiss, M., Gabauer, D. J., Riexinger, L. E., & Gabler, H.C. (2023). Properties of Encroachments and the Associated Roadway and Roadside Environment in the Second Strategic Highway Re-search Program. Transportation Research Record, 2677(5), 1253-1263. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221141896
3. Budzynski, M., Wilde, K., Jamroz, K., Chroscielewski, J., Witkowski, W., Burzynski, S., Bruski, D., Jelinski, L., & Pachocki, Ł. (2019). The Effects of Vehicle Restraint Systems on Road Safety. Edited by K. Wilde and M. Niedostatkiewicz. MATEC Web of Conferences 262(4): 05003, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201926205003
4. Budzyński, M., & Antoniuk, M. (2017). The guidelines and principles for planning and design of road restraint systems. MATEC Web of Conferences 122, 02001, 1-6. DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20171220
5. Calvi, A., Cafiso, S.D., D'Agostino, C., Kieć, M., Petrucci, G. (2023). A driving simulator study to evaluate the effects of different types of median separation on driving behavior on 2 + 1 roads. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 180(3), 106922, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106922
6. CEN TC226/WG1 Crash Barriers, Safety Fences, Guard Rails and Bridge Parapets (2023). PrEN 1317-4 Road restraint systems - Part 4: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for transitions of safety barriers.
7. Chell, J., Brandani, C.E., Fraschetti, S., Chakraverty, J., & Camomilla, V. (2019). Limitations of the European barrier crash testing regulation relating to occupant safety. Accident Analysis & Pre-vention, 133, 105239, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.015
8. Circular protocol No. 62032 of July 21, 2010. Department for Transport, Navigation, and Infor-mation and Statistical Systems Directorate General for Road Safety. Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport. https://www.mit.gov.it/normativa/circolare-protocollo-62032-del-21072010
9. CSI Test Report, N. 0044MEHRB23, 2023. Laboratory Infrastructures & Mobility, Bollate, Mi-lan, Italy
10. Dinnella, N., Chiappone, S., & Guerrieri, M. (2020). The innovative “NDBA” concrete safety barrier able to withstand two subsequent TB81 crash tests. Engineering Failure Analysis, 115, 104660, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104660
11. EN 1317-1 (2010) Road restraint systems – part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test meth-ods.
12. EN 1317-2 (2010) Road restraint systems – part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets.
13. EN 1317-3 (2010) Road Safety Barriers – Performance classes, acceptance criteria based on im-pact tests, and test methods for crash cushions
14. Gitelman, V., & Doveh, E. (2022). A Comparative Evaluation of the Safety Performance of Medi-an Barriers on Rural Highways; A Case-Study. In: Akhnoukh, A., et al. Advances in Road Infra-structure and Mobility. IRF 2021. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_22
15. Graham, J., Harwood, D., Richard, K., O'Laughlin, M., Donnell, E., & Brennan, S. (2014). NCHRP Report 794: Median Cross-Section Design for Rural Divided Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
16. Italian National Road Agency (2019). Road Safety Barrier Guidelines. ANAS Technical Note Vol. 6. https://www.stradeanas.it/sites/default/files/pdf/1.3.3/Quaderni_tecnici_Volume_6.pdf
17. Karunarathna, S., Linforth, S., Kashani, A., Liu. X., & Ngo, T. (2024). Numerical investigation on the behaviour of concrete barriers subjected to vehicle impacts using modified K&C material mod-el, Engineering Structures, 308, paper ID 117943,1-13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117943
18. Khan, Md N., & Das S. (2024). Advancing traffic safety through the safe system approach: A systematic review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 199, 107518 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107518
19. Kim, W.S., Lee, I., AU – Jeong, Y., Zi, G., Kim, K., & Lee, J. (2018). Design Approach for Im-proving Current Concrete Median Barriers on Highways in South Korea. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32(2), 04018022. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001168
20. La Torre, F., Erginbas, C., Thomson, R., Amato, G., Pengal, B., Stefan, C., Hemmings, G. (2016). Selection of the Most Appropriate Roadside Vehicle Restraint System – The SAVeRS Project. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 4237–4246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.395
21. Lie, A., & Tingvall, C. (2024). Are crash causation studies the best way to understand system fail-ures. Who can we blame? Accident Analysis & Prevention 196, 107432, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107432
22. Liu, Y. (2020). Safety barriers. Research advances and new thoughts on theory, engineering and management. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 67, 104260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104260
23. Miaou, S.-P., Bligh, R. P., & Lord, D. (2005). Developing Guidelines for Median Barrier Installa-tion: Benefit–Cost Analysis with Texas Data. Transportation Research Record, 1904(1), 2–19, https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105190400101
24. Ministerial Decree (Italian) No. 2367. Italian Road safety barriers guidelines. Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, 21/06/2004.
25. Ministerial Decree (Italian) No. 6792. Functional and geometric standards for road construction. Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, 05/11/2001.
26. Ministerial Decree (Italian) No. 223. Instructions and requirements for the design, approval, and use of road safety barriers. Italian Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport, 18/02/1992.
27. Molan, A.M., Moomen, M., & Ksaibati, K. (2019). Investigating the effect of geometric dimen-sions of median traffic barriers on crashes: Crash analysis of interstate roads in Wyoming using ac-tual crash datasets. Journal of Safety Research, 71, 163-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.10.001
28. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2012). Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems: Second Edition (NCHRP Report 600). Washington, DC: The National Acade-mies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/22706
29. Pitblado, R., Fisher, M., Nelson, B., Fløtaker, H., Molazemi, K., & Stokke., A. (2016). Concepts for dynamic barrier management. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 43, 741-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.07.005
30. Pompigna, A., & Mauro, R. (2022). Smart roads: A state of the art of highways innovations in the Smart Age. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J., 25, 100986, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2021.04.005
31. Qawasmeh, B., & Eustace, D. (2021). Effectiveness of Cable Median Barriers in Preventing Cross Median Crashes and Related Casualties in the United States - A Systematic Review. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures, pp.345 – 354, 2022. 18th International Road Federation World Meeting and Exhibition, 2021 Dubai, 7-10 November 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79801-7_24
32. Russo, J.B., & Savolainen, P.T. (2018). A comparison of freeway median crash frequency, severi-ty, and barrier strike outcomes by median barrier type. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 117, 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.04.023
33. Shaffie, E., & Zin, N.M.M. (2023) Shiong, F., Arshad, A. K., Ahmad, J.: A Study on the effective-ness of rolling barrier system at straight road and curved road: a review. International Journal of Integrated Engineering 2023, 15(1), 310 – 320. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/ijie/article/view/9433
34. Silvestri Dobrovolny, C., Johnson, B. A., Bligh, R., Kovar, J., Barrett, M. E., Klenzendorf, B., Hendrickson, G., Retterer, T., & Ries, J. (2021) Development and Testing of a Concrete Median Barrier for Flood-Prone Areas. Transportation Research Record, 2675(11), 1015–1027, https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211023759
35. Sklet, S. (2006). Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Pre-vention in the Process Industries, 19(5), 494-506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2005.12.004
36. Tahmasseby, S., Muley, D., & Wink, B. W. (2021) Performance Evaluation of Vehicle Restraint Systems in the Context of Design and Installation. Civil Engineering Journal, 7(3), 449-460, http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091665
37. Yang, J., Xu, G., Cai, C.S., & Kareem, A. (2019) Crash performance evaluation of a new movable median guardrail on highways, Eng. Struct., 182, 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.090
38. Wang, Q., Fang, H ., &Yin, H. (2018). A Probability-Based Approach for Assessment of Concrete Median Barriers. International Conference on Transportation and Development 2018 (ASCE), pp. 171 – 179. DOI: 10.1061/9780784481530.017
39. Wu, Z., Yu, F., & Yuan, L. (2009) Safety Design of Median Barriers Impacted on Elevated Road. 2009 International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Zhang-jiajie, China, 2009, pp. 586-589, DOI: 10.1109/ICMTMA.2009.565.
40. Zou, Y., & Tarko, A.P. (2016). An insight into the performance of road barriers - redistribution of barrier-relevant crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 96, 152-161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.022
41. Zou, Y., & Tarko, A. P., Chen, E., & Romero, M.A. (2014). Effectiveness of cable barriers, guard-rails, and concrete barrier walls in reducing the risk of injury. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 72 (11), 55–65, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.013
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
Data can be provided upon kind request to the corresponding authors
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Archives of Transport journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
