Preliminary safety assessment of Polish interchanges


  • Marcin Budzyński Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Environmental Engineering, Highway and Transportation Engineering Department, Gdansk Author
  • Agnieszka Tubis Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Maintenance and Operation of Technical Systems, Wroclaw Author
  • Mateusz Rydlewski Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Maintenance and Operation of Technical Systems, Wroclaw Author



road safety, road infrastructure, interchanges


Interchanges are a key and the most complex element of a road infrastructure. The safety and functionality of interchanges determine the traffic conditions and safety of the entire road network. This applies particularly to motorways and expressways, for which they are the only way to access and exchange traffic. A big problem in Poland is the lack of comprehensive tools for designers at individual stages of the design process. This applies to guidelines or other documents regarding the location, choice of interchanges type and selection of design parameters. This does not provide sufficient material for designing safe and functional interchanges. This situation results in numerous hazards that occur on existing interchanges and errors that are still being made at all stages of the design process. Consequently, there is a risk of accidents in the area of interchanges, which often have serious consequences. The purpose of the research presented in the article is to identify main groups of hazards on the interchanges and to classify them based on field tests and audits of project documentation. The prepared classification uses the results of analyzing data on road accidents. As part of the research, a database was built that includes information on road accidents and traffic, as well as data on all existing interchanges on motorways and expressways in Poland. These data includes: interchange type, length of exit and entry lanes, total interchanges length, type of cross-section on main roads and ramps. The number and type of ramps occurring at a given interchange as well as the type of intersections, if any, were also taken into account. Based on the assessment, the level of safety was determined for individual types of interchanges. Then, the impact of selected road and traffic factors on safety was presented. The critical elements of interchanges are entries, exits, weaving sections and intersections. Assumptions were also adopted for the classification of identified hazards. A comprehensive safety assessment for interchanges allowed the development of assumptions for their design guidelines. On the basis of database exploration and field research, the main problems and hazards regarding the functioning of interchanges were identified.


AASHTO, 2018. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 7th Edition

ABATAN, A., SAVOLAINEN, P. T., 2018. Safety Analysis of Interchange Functional Areas. Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2672 (30).

ABDELATY, M.A.; RADWAN, A.E., 2000. Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention 32, 633–642.

AMBROS J, TUREK, R., BRICH, M., AND MIKSOVA, D., 2018. Safety screening of Czech core road network. 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

AMBROS, J., ALTMANN, J., JUREWICZ, C., CHEVALIER, A., 2019. Proactive assessment of road curve safety using floating car data: an exploratory study. Archives of Transport Volume 50, Issue 2.

AUSTROADS, 2015. Guide to Road Design Part 4C: Interchanges.

BARED, J. G., GIERIN, G. L., WARREN, D. L., 1999. Safety evaluation of acceleration and deceleration lane lengths. ITE Journal.

BAUER, K.M., HARWOOD, D.W., 1998. Statistical models of accidents on interchange ramps and speed-change lanes. Report No. FHWA-RD-97-106.

BONNESON, J. A., GEEDIPALLY, S., PRATT, M. P., AND LORD, D., 2012, Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges. NCHRP Project 17-45 Final Report. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.

BUDZYNSKI, M., JAMROZ, K., KUSTRA, W., 2017. Road safety inspection as a tool for road safety management – the Polish experience. Journal of KONBiN 42.

CHEN, H., LEE, C., LIN, P. S., 2014. Investigation Motorcycle Safety at Exit Ramp Sections by Analyzing Historical Crash Data and Rider’s Perception. Journal of Transportation Technologies 04 (01):107-115.

CHEN, H., LIU, P., LU, J.J., BEHZADI, B., 2009. Evaluating the safety impacts of the number and arrangement of lanes on freeway exit ramps. Accident Analysis and Prevention 41, 543-551.

CHEN, H., ZHOU, H., ZHAO, J., HSU, P., 2011. Safety performance evaluation of left-side off ramps at freeway diverge areas. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 605-612.

CHIMBA, D., LAN, C.J., LI, J.B., 2006.Statistical Evaluation of Motorcycle Crash Injury Severities by Using Multinomial Models. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

DINU, R.; VEERARAGAVAN, A., 2011. Random parameter models for accident prediction on two-lane undivided highways in India. Journal of Safety Research 42.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA), 2007. Interchange Safety Analysis Tool (ISAT): User Manual. U.S. Department of Transportation.

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION (FHWA), 2010. Status of the Nation’s High-ways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions & Performance. U.S. Department of Transportation.

GARCIA, A., ROMERO, A.R., 2006. Experimental observation of vehicle evolution on a deceleration lane with different lengths. 85th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

GARNOWSKI, M., MANNER, H., 2011. On factors related to car accidents on German Autobahn connectors. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 1864-1871.

GOLOB, T.F., RECKER, W.W., ALVAREZ V.M., 2004. Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections, Transportation Research Part A: Pol-icy and Practice Volume 38, Issue 1.

GREEN, E. R., KENNETH, R. A., PIGMAN, J. G., 2010. Research Report: Kennedy Inter-change Crash Study. University of Kentucky, Kentucky Transportation Cente.

HAVÂRNEANU, G.M.; HAVÂRNEANU, C.E., 2012. When norms turn perverse: Contextual irrationality vs. rational traffic violations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 15, 144–151.

HU, J., LI, F., HAN, B., YAO, J., 2017. Analysis of the influence on expressway safety of ramps. Archive of Transport volume 43, issue 3.

JACYNA, M., PYZA, D., WASIAK, M., 2011. The importance of transport infrastructure in the implementation of logistics processes, TSS 7-8, 16-20

KIATTIKOMOL, V., 2005. Freeway Crash Prediction Models for Long-Range Urban Transportation Planning. PhD diss., University of Tennessee.

KRYSTEK, R., red., 2008. Interchanges, WKŁ, edition II.

LAYTON, R., 2012. Interchange Access Management. The Kiewit Centre for Infrastructure and Transportation.

LI, Z., LIU P., WANG, W., XU, C., 2012. Using support vector machine models for crash in-jury severity analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 45, 478–486.

LOO, B.P., 2009. The identification of hazardous road locations: A comparison of the black site and hot zone methodologies in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 3, 187–202.

MARTÍN, L.; BAENA, L.; GARACH, L.; LÓPEZ, G.; DE OÑA, J., 2014. Using data mining techniques to road safety improvement in Spanish roads. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 160, 607–614.

MINDERHOUD, M.M.; BOVY, P.H., 2001 Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention 33, 89-97.

PILKO, P., BARED, J. G., EDARA, P. K., KIM, T., 2007. Safety assessment of interchange spacing on urban freeways, The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

PLUG, C.; XIA, J.C.; CAULFIELD, C., 2011. Spatial and temporal visualisation techniques for crash analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention 43, 1937-1946.

RAA, 2008. Guidelines R1 for the Design of Motorways. Germany.

ROMANOWSKA, A., JAMROZ, K., OLSZEWSKI, P., 2019. Preview of methods for assessing traffic conditions on basic motorway and expressway sections. Archives of Transport Volume 52, Issue 4.

RUDYK, T., SZCZEPAŃSKI, E., JACYNA, M., 2019. Safety factor in the sustainable fleet management model, Archive of Transport, 49 (1), 103-114.

RUNDMO, T.; IVERSEN, H., 2004. Risk perception and driving behaviour among adolescents in two Norwegian counties before and after a traffic safety campaign. Safety Science 42, 1-21.

SALVARANI, C.P.; COLLI, B.O.; JÚNIOR, C.G.C., 2009. Impact of a program for the prevention of traffic accidents in a Southern Brazilian city: A model for implementation in a developing country. Surgical Neurology.

SARHAN, M., HASSAN, Y., EL HALIM, A.O.A., 2008. Safety Performance of Freeway Sections and Relation to Length of Speed Change Lanes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 35 (5), 531-541.

SUN, C., EDARA, P., BROWN, H., NEM-MERS, C., CLAROS, B., KHEZERZADEH, A., ZHANG, M., NAM, K., BERRY, J., 2016. Crash Location Correction for Freeway Interchange Modeling. Cmr16-010. Missouri Department of Transportation, Mid-America Transportation Center, Missouri.

THE MINISTER OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND CONSTRUCTION, 2016. Regulation of the Minister of Transport and Maritime Economy on the technical conditions to be met by public roads and their location.

TORBIC, D.J, HARWOOD, D.W., GILMORE, D.K., RICHARD, K.R., BARED, J.G., 2009. Safety Analysis of Interchanges. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

WANG, L., SHI, Q., ABDELATY, M., 2015. Predicting crashes on expressway ramps with real time traffic and weather data. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

WANG, Z., CHEN, H., LU, J.J., 2009. Exploring impacts of factors contributing to injury severity at freeway diverge areas. Transportation Research Record Issue 2102, Pages 43-52.

YEUNG, J.S.; WONG, Y.D., 2013. Road traffic accidents in Singapore expressway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 38, 534–541.






Original articles

How to Cite

Budzyński, M., Tubis, A., & Rydlewski, M. (2021). Preliminary safety assessment of Polish interchanges. Archives of Transport, 58(2), 99-113.


Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.