Evaluation of the effects of fires and explosions in the transport of hazardous materials

Authors

  • Marc J. Assael Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece Author
  • Leandros Ch. Paschalidis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece Author
  • George P. Sakellaropoulos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1169206

Keywords:

hazardous materials, fires, explosions, road transport, ADR vehicles, pipelines

Abstract

Transportation of liquid and gaseous fuels and chemicals, albeit not frequent, can lead to serious dangers for humans, the environment and property due to fires and explosions. The two most common transportation modes on land are tanker trucks and pipelines. The effects of fires and explosions in such transportations can be modelled successfully to describe observed damages, as discussed here for three different types of accidents, namely tanker trucks carrying liquefied natural gas (LNG) or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), and a gas pipeline, resulting in ignition and explosion. The effects of overpressure due to explosion and of radiated heat by fires are effectively modelled. The methodology and the developed e-platform are valuable teaching tools for engineers and civic personnel in order to foresee and assess risk and accident consequences near inhabited areas, and/or to predict alternate routes.

References

ARGUS CONSULTING SERVICES, 2013. LPG Consumption in Europe.

ARIA DATABASE, 2004. Rupture and ignition of a gas pipeline. Ghislenghien, Belgium. No. 27681. French Ministry for Sustainable Development - DGPR / SRT / BARPI.

ARIA DATABASE, ARIA database, France. Available: http://www.aria-database.com/ [2015].

ASSAEL, M.J. and KAKOSIMOS, K.E., 2010a. Can a course on the calculation of the effects of fires, explosions and toxic gas dispersions, be topical, enjoyable and meaningful? Education for Chemical Engineers, 5(3), pp. e45-e53.

ASSAEL, M.J. and KAKOSIMOS, K.E., 2010b. Fires, explosions, and toxic gas dispersions: effects calculation and risk analysis. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press.

BAGSTER, D.F. and PITTBLADO, R.M., 1989. Thermal hazards in the process industry. Chemical Engineering Progress, 87, pp. 69-75.

CAUMONT, M. and PONTHIEU, S., 2000. Safety provisions and LPG, IChemE Symposium series no. 147, April 4-6 2000, pp. 1-14.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, 2014. Transport Statistics Great Britain. London HM Stationary Office.

EEGA, East European Gas Analysis. Available: http://www.eegas.com/fsu.htm [2015].

EGIG, 2015. 9th Report of the European Gas Pipeline Incident Data Group. EGIG 14.R.0403.

EIA, 2006. Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Receiving Terminal and Associated Facilities. Part 2 – South Soko, Sections 13-18. ESB-126/2005. Environmental Resources Management.

EUROGAS, 2014. Statistical Report. Brussels.

FRIEDRICH, S. and NEUMÜLLER, J., 2007. North European Gas Pipeline. CIVPRO Working Paper 2007:3.

KAKOSIMOS, K. and MIHAILIDI, E., 2010. European Workshop on Teaching Safety in Chemical Engineering. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 88, pp. III-IV.

KIRCHNAWY, F., 2012. Gefahrguttransport: was können die Vorschriften bewirken? Chemikalien Sicher Transportieren 2012, October 15-16 2012.

KLETZ, T., 2003. Still going wrong!: case histories of process plant disasters and how they could have been avoided. Boston, USA: Elsevier, Butterworth-Heinemann.

KLETZ, T.A., 1986. Transportation of hazardous substances: The UK scene. Plant/Operations Progress, 5(3), pp. 160-164.

LEES F.P, 2003. Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

MARCOGAZ, 2013. Technical Statistics Report. 01-01-2013. Technical Association of the European Natural Gas Industry.

NEEDS, Nov. 2007. Project Report. European Union FP6.

NGVA, Natural Gas and Biogas Vehicle Association. Available: http://www.ngvaeurope.eu/ [2015].

NTSB, 2014. Annual Report to the Congress. National Transportation Safety Board.

OGP, 2010. Land transport accident statistics. No. 434 – 9. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.

PLANAS-CUCHI, E., GASULLA, N., VENTOSA, A. and CASAL, J., 2004. Explosion of a road tanker containing liquified natural gas. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 17(4), pp. 315-321.

PONGAS, E., TODOROVA, A. and GAMBINI, G., 2014. Trade in energy products: Statistical analysis of EU trade in energy products, with focus on trade with the Russian Federation. EUROSTAT Statistics in focus, 13..

SAKELLAROPOULOS, G.P., LULAS, M., SKODRAS, G. and NUNES, G., 2014. Safety Management in the Transportation of Dangerous and Sensitive Goods, D. PYZA, ed. In: 7th Int. Conf. on Logistics Systems Theory and Practice, September 2-5 2014.

SHEN, X., YAN, Y., LI, X., XIE, C. and WANG, L., 2014. Analysis on tank truck accidents involved in road hazardous materials transportation in China. Traffic injury prevention, 15(7), pp. 762-768.

STINTON, H., 1983. Spanish camp site disaster. Journal of hazardous materials, 7(4), pp. 393-401.

THOMAS, P., 1963. The size of flames from natural fires, Symposium (International) on Combustion 1963, Elsevier, pp. 844-859.

TNO, 1989. Methods for the Determination of Possible Damage to People and Objects Resulting from Releases of Hazardous Materials, Roos A.J. (Ed), Green book, Report CPR 16E, Chapter 1.

TNO, 2005. Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects due to Releases of Hazardous Materials (Liquids and Gases), van den Bosch C.J.H, Weterings R.A.P.M. (Eds), Yellow book. Report CPR 14E. 3rd edn. Director-General of Labour.

ZAREA, M., 2006. Mechanical Damage: How big is the problem? A European Perspective. Mechanical Damage Workshop February 29th - March 1st 2006.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-30

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

Assael, M. J., Paschalidis, L. C., & Sakellaropoulos, G. P. (2015). Evaluation of the effects of fires and explosions in the transport of hazardous materials. Archives of Transport, 34(2), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.5604/08669546.1169206

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 > >> 

Similar Articles

1-10 of 376

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

How to calculate the accident probability of dangerous substance transport

Pavel Fuchs, Tomas Saska, Radovan Sousek, David Valis (Author)