The assessment of the use of vehicles with different types of drive in car-sharing systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2024.bg4xmr95Keywords:
sustainable development, multi-criteria decision support, MAJA method, point method of multi-criteria evaluation, car-sharing, fleet managementAbstract
One of the main challenges of contemporary transport policy is to reduce the share of individual means of transport in the structure of transport, i.e., to reduce the number of private cars used as the primary means of transportation. This issue is particularly important in urban areas, where congestion generates significant economic costs and poses specific risks to the environment and air quality, ultimately negatively affecting the health of residents. Over the past decades, many solutions have been developed to support the reduction of car traffic, most of which are implemented in urban areas, including short-term car rental services - car-sharing. As the popularity of such services grows, numerous scientific studies have been undertaken to analyze various social, environmental, or economic aspects related to the practical implementation of these systems. A niche area that still remains underexplored is research directly related to the vehicles that make up car-sharing fleets. Addressing this research gap, this article is dedicated to determining which vehicles, considering the type of propulsion used, are optimal for creating a car-sharing fleet based on, separately and collectively, economic, technical, and environmental criteria. To this end, an original procedure was proposed, taking into account the analysis of secondary data on car-sharing fleets in Poland, expert studies conducted among operators of these services, and mathematical analyses using multi-criteria decision support methods (point method of multi-criteria evaluation, MAJA). The study included vehicles with conventional, hybrid, and electric propulsion. Five vehicles of the same model and brand, each with a different type of propulsion, belonging to the most popular C-market segment in car-sharing systems in Poland, were considered. The analyses made it possible to identify the vehicles best suited to the needs of car-sharing in terms of technical, economic, and environmental criteria. The results indicate that under current conditions, considering all evaluation criteria simultaneously, an electric-powered vehicle is the optimal solution. When vehicles were evaluated from the perspective of one of the strategic objectives, plug-in hybrid vehicles dominated. Such vehicles proved to be the most advantageous solution, whether only economic or technical criteria were considered. Electric cars, followed by plug-in hybrid cars, are the best choice when decisions are evaluated from an environmental perspective. The proposed method serves as a decision-making guide for implementing or modernizing fleets in car-sharing systems, which can be used by car-sharing operators to organize their vehicle fleets, as well as by city authorities in selecting car-sharing service providers whose fleet meets their expectations.
References
1. Alencar, V. A., Rooke, F., Cocca, M., Vassio, L., Almeida, J., Vieira, A. B. (2019). Characterizing client usage patterns and service demand for car-sharing systems. Information Systems, 98, 101448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101448.
2. Alonso-Almeida, M.d.M. (2022). To Use or Not Use Car Sharing Mobility in the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic? Identifying Sharing Mobility Behaviour in Times of Crisis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pu-blic Health, 19(5), 3127. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053127.
3. Ambroziak T., Lewczuk K. (2009). Multicriteria evaluation in application to storage area configura-tion. Automatyka Elektroenergetyczna, 13(2).
4. Ampudia-Renuncio, M., Guirao, B., Molina-Sánchez, R., de Alvarez, C. E. (2020). Understanding the spatial distribution of free-floating carsharing in cities: analysis of the new Madrid experience through a web-based platform. Cities, 98, 102593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102593.
5. AUTOCENTRUM, (2024). Independent automotive portal. Available online: https://www.autocentrum.pl/dane-techniczne/peugeot/308/iii/hatchback-plug-in/silnik-hybrydowy-1.6-hybrid-180km-od-2021/, [Accessed on: 02.03.2024].
6. Awasthi, A., Breuil, D., Singh Chauhan, S., Parent, M., Reveillere, T. (2007). A Multicriteria Deci-sion Making Approach for Carsharing Stations Selection. J. Decis. Syst., 16, 57–78. https://doi.org/10.3166/jds.16.57-78.
7. Balac, M., Becker, H., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K.W. (2019). Modeling competing free-floating carshar-ing operators–A case study for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 98, 101-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.011.
8. Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Mannering, F. (2020). Individuals’ willingness to rent their personal vehicle to others: An exploratory assess-ment of peer-to-peer carsharing. Transportation Research Inter-disciplinary Perspectives, 5, 100138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100138.
9. Bardhi, F., Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: the case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898. https://doi.org/10.1086/666376.
10. Basiago, A. D. (1996). The search for the sustainable city in 20th century urban planning, Environ-mentalist, 16, 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325104.
11. Becker, H., Ciari, F., Axhausen, K. (2017). Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns. Transp. Res. Part A, 97, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.004.
12. Bocken, N., Jonca, A., Södergren, K., Palm, J. (2020). Emergence of Carsharing Business Models and Sustainability Impacts in Swedish Cities. sustainability, 12(4), 1594. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041594.
13. Boldrini, C., Bruno, R., Laarabi, M. H. (2019). Weak signals in the mobility landscape: car sharing in ten European cities. EPJ Data Science, 8(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0193-6.
14. Brendel, A. B., Lichtenberg, S., Brauer, B., Nastjuk, I., & Kolbe, L. M. (2018). Improving electric vehicle utilization in carsharing: A framework and simulation of an e-carsharing vehicle utilization management system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 64, 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.007.
15. Britton, E. (1999). A Short History of Early Car Sharing Innovations. World Transport Policy & Practice, 5, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459908721448.
16. Bruglieri, M., Colorni, A., Luè, A. (2014). The relocation problem for the one-way electric vehicle sharing. Networks, 64(4), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/net.21569.
17. Burkhardt, J. (2000). Limitations of mass transportation and individual vehicle systems for older persons. In K. W. Schaie & M. Pietrucha (Eds.). Mobility and Transportation in the Elderly, 97–124. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3288-6_6.
18. Caggiani, L., Prencipe, L. P., Ottomanelli, M. (2020). A static relocation strategy for electric car-sharing systems in a vehicle-to-grid framework. Transportation Letters, Article in press, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2020.1778456.
19. Car Labelling, (2024). Recherche multicritères. Available online: https://carlabelling.ademe.fr/recherche?searchString=&co2=&brand=peugeot&model=308&category=&range=&carbu%5B%5D=EL&transmission=&price=0%2C500000&maxconso=&energy=0%2C7&RechercherL=Rechercher&offset=0&orderby[]=particules%20desc&searchString, [Accessed on: 12.03.2024].
20. Carrone, A. P., Hoening, V. M., Jensen, A. F., Mabit, S. E., Rich, J. (2020). Understanding car sharing preferences and mode substitution patterns: a stated preference experiment. Transport Pol-icy, 98, 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.06.010.
21. Cartenì, A., Cascetta, E., de Luca, S. (2016). A random utility model for park & carsharing services and the pure preference for electric vehicles. Transport Policy, 48, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.02.011.
22. Central Statistical Office, (2024). Transportation and communications. Available online: https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/, [Accessed on: 19.04.2024].
23. Chargemap, (2024). Statistics. Available online: https://chargemap.com/about/stats/poland, [Ac-cessed on: 23.03.2024].
24. Charoniti, E., Kim, J., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H. J. (2020). Intrapersonal heterogeneity in car-sharing decision-making processes by activity-travel contexts: a context-dependent latent class ran-dom utility–random regret model. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(7), 501-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1768719.
25. Chun, Y.-Y., Matsumoto, M., Tahara, K., Chinen, K., Endo, H. (2019). Exploring factors affecting car sharing use intention in the Southeast Asia region: A case study in Java, Indonesia. sustainabil-ity, 11(18), 5103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185103.
26. CIVITAS, (2022). Civitas Project—Car-Sharing. Available online: http://civitas.eu/car-independent/car-sharing, [Accessed on: 15.03.2024].
27. Clark, M., Gifford, K., Anable, J., Le Vine, S. (2015). Business-to-business carsharing: evidence from Britain of factors associated with employer-based carsharing membership and its impacts. Transportation, 42(3), 471–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9531-4.
28. Cohen, A. P., Shaheen, S., Kenzie, R. (2008). Carsharing: A guide for local planners. Institute of Transportation Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2008.07.006.
29. Cronin, P., Ryan, F., Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step ap-proach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059.
30. Deza, A., Huang, K., Metel, M. R. (2020). Charging station optimization for balanced electric car sharing. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 308, 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2020.05.017.
31. Doherty, M., Sparrow, F., Sinha, K. (1987). Public use of autos: Mobility Enterprise Project. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 113(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1987)113:1(84).
32. Domański, R. (2012). Evolutionary spatial management.Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicz-nego w Poznaniu. Poznań. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11379-7_6.
33. Dombi, T. (2018). Carsharing - An alternative to car ownership. Available online: https://docplayer.pl/, [Accessed on: 03.03.2024].
34. European Commission, (2015). Reclaiming city streets for people. Chaos or quality of life? Availa-ble online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/pubs/pdf/streets_people.pdf, [Accessed on: 17.03.2024].
35. European Commission, (2017). MOMO Car-Sharing Project—Business Plan for Car-Sharing. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/momo_car-sharing_a_business_plan_for_car_sharing_en_en.pdf, [Accessed on: 04.04.2024].
36. European Commission, (2017). MOMO Car-Sharing Project—Identifying Locations for New Car-Sharing Services. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/projects/sites/iee-projects/files/projects/documents/momo_car-sharing_identifying_locations_for_new_car_sharing_services_en.pdf, [Accessed on: 15.03.2024].
37. European Environment Agency, (2009). Ensuring quality of life in Europe's cities and towns. Avail-able online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/quality-of-life-in-Europes-cities-and-towns, [Accessed on: 22.03.2024].
38. eurostat, (2024). Available online:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat, [Accessed on: 19.03.2024].
39. eurostat, (2024). Sustainable development in the European Union.Available online:https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/7745644/KS-02-16-996-EN-N.pdf/eae6b7f9-d06c-4c83-b16f-c72b0779ad03, [Accessed on: 18.03.2024].
40. Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., Vesco, A. (2018). Car-sharing services: An annotated review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 37, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020.
41. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (Eds.). (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23081-5.
42. Firnkorn, J., Müller, M. (2015). Free-floating electric car-sharing fleets in smart cities: The dawning of a post-private car era in urban environments? Environmental Science & Policy, 45, 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.005.
43. Fleury, S., Tom, A., Jamet, E., Colas-Maheux, E. (2017). What drives corporate carsharing ac-ceptance? A French case study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behav-iour, 45, 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.12.010.
44. Fundacja Instytut na rzecz Ekorozwoju. (1999). Alternative Transport Policy according to the Prin-ciples of Sustainable Development. Available online: www.ine-isd.org.pl, [Accessed on: 02.04.2024].
45. Goswami, T., Pająk, M., Skrzypiński, W. (2000). Biocompatibility of selected extractants in the continuous extractive ethanol fermentation. Inżynieria Chemiczna i Procesowa, 21, 645. – 90.
46. Grzelec, K., Wyszomirski, O. (2017). Polityka transportowa w miastach i aglomeracjach. In W. Rydzkowski (Ed.). Współczesna polityka transportowa, 253-271. Warszawa: PWE.
47. Hahn, R., Ostertag, F., Lehr, A., Büttgen, M., Benoit, S. (2020). I like it, but I don't use it: Impact of carsharing business models on usage intentions in the sharing economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1404–1418. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2430.
48. Harms, S., & Truffer, B. (1998). The Emergence of a Nationwide Carsharing Co-Operative in Switzerland. Research Report; EAWAG: Dübendorf, Germany.
49. Haughton, G. (1997). Developing sustainable urban development models. Cities, 14(4), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(97)00008-9.
50. Hjorteset, M. A., Böcker, L. (2020). Car sharing in Norwegian urban areas: Examining interest, intention and the decision to enrol. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 84, 102322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102322.
51. Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., Penz, E. (2017). Power versus trust – what matters more in collaborative consumption? Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-03-2016-0118.
52. Hu, S., Chen, P., Lin, H., Xie, C., Chen, X. (2018). Promoting carsharing attractiveness and effi-ciency: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 65, 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.08.014.
53. Hua, Y., Zhao, D., Wang, X., Li, X. (2019). Joint infrastructure planning and fleet management for one-way electric car sharing under time-varying uncertain demand. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 128, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.01.012.
54. Hui, Y., Wang, W., Ding, M., Liu, Y. (2017). Behavior Patterns of Long-term Car-sharing Users in China. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4662-4678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.371.
55. inwestycje.pl, (2024). Available online: https://inwestycje.pl/, [Accessed on: 10.04.2024].
56. Jacquillat, A., & Zoepf, S. (2018). Deployment and utilization of plug-in electric vehicles in round-trip car-sharing systems. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(2), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1362417.
57. Jacyna M., (2001). Multi-criteria modeling as applied to the evaluation of transportation systems. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Transport, 47, 3-139.
58. Jacyna, M. (2009). Modeling and evaluation of transportation systems. Oficyna Wydawnicza Poli-techniki Warszawskiej.
59. Jacyna, M. (red.) (2014). Formation of systems in selected areas of transport and logistics. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
60. Jacyna, M., (1998). Some aspects of multicriteria evaluation of traffic flow distribution in a multi-modal transport corridor. Archives of Transport, 10(1/2), 37-52.
61. Jacyna, M., Kakietek, S., Przygocki, M. (2004). Multi-criteria modeling of traffic flow distribution in a multimodal transport corridor. Part II - assessment of infrastructure adjustment to tasks. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Transport, 52.
62. Jacyna, M., Wasiak, M., (2007). Method of multi-criteria evaluation of options for the implementa-tion of infrastructure investments in transport. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej, Transport, 63, 119-124.
63. Jung, J., Koo, Y. (2018).Analyzing the Effects of Car Sharing Services on the Reduction of Green-house Gas (GHG). Emissions. sustainability, 10(2), 539-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020539.
64. Kim, D., Park, Y., Ko, J. (2019).Factors underlying vehicle ownership reduction among carsharing users: A repeated cross-sectional analysis. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 76, 123–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.018.
65. Kim, J., Rasouli, S., Timmermans, H. J. P. (2017). The effects of activity-travel context and indi-vidual attitudes on car-sharing decisions under travel time uncertainty: A hybrid choice modeling approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 56, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.022.
66. Ko, J., Ki, H., Lee, S. (2019). Factors affecting carsharing program participants’ car ownership changes. Transportation Letters, 11(4), 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1329891.
67. Kozłowski, S. (1997). On the road to eco-development. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Kubik, A. (2022). Impact of the Use of Electric Scooters from Shared Mobility Systems on the Us-ers. Smart Cities, 5(3), 1079–1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5030054. 64
68. Kukuła, K. (2000). Zero-based unitization method. Wydawnistwo Naukowe PWN.
69. Kypriadis, D., Pantziou, G., Konstantopoulos, C., Gavalas, D. (2020). Optimizing relocation cost in free-floating car-sharing systems.IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(9), 4017-4030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2020.2995197.
70. Lagadic, M., Verloes, A., Louvet, N. (2019). Can carsharing services be profitable? A critical re-view of established and developing busi-ness models. Transport Policy, 77(3), 68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.02.006.
71. Larish R., (2014), Car Sharing. Biblioteka Źródłowa Energetyki Prosumenckiej. http://ilabepro.polsl.pl/bzep/static/uploads/LARISCH_Romuald_-_Car_Sharing.pdf, [Accessed on: 05.04.2024].
72. Le Vine, S., Polak, J. (2017).The impact of free-floating carsharing on car ownership: Early-stage findings from London. Transp. Policy, 75, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.02.004.
73. Li, W., Li, Y., Fan, J., Deng, H. (2017). Siting of Carsharing Stations Based on Spatial Multi-Criteria Evaluation: A Case Study of Shanghai EVCARD. sustainability, 9, 152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205627.
74. Loose, W., Mohr, M., Nobis, C. (2006). Assessment of the future development of car sharing in Germany and related opportunities. Transport Reviews, 26(3), 365– 382. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640500495096.
75. Lu, X., Zhang, Q., Peng, Z., Shao, Z., Song, H., Wang, W. (2020). Charging and relocating optimi-zation for electric vehicle car-sharing: Anevent-based strategy improvement approach. Energy, 207, 118285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118285.
76. Ma, F., Guo, D., Yuen, K. F., Sun, Q., Ren, F., Xu, X., Zhao, C. (2020). The influence of continu-ous improvement of public car-sharing platforms on passenger loyalty: a mediation and moderation analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), 2756. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082756.
77. Mallus, M., Colistra, G., Atzori, L., Murroni, M., Pilloni, V. (2017). Dynamic Carpooling in Urban Areas: Design and Experimentation with a Multi-Objective Route Matching Algorith. Sustainability, 9(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020254.
78. Martin, E., Shaheen, S. (2011).The Impact of Carsharing on Public Transit and Non-Motorized Travel: An Exploration of North American Carsharing Survey Data. energies, 4(11), 2094–2114. https://doi.org/10.3390/en4112094.
79. Meelen, T., Frenken, K., Hobrink, S. (2019). Weak spots for car-sharing in The Netherlands? The geography of socio-technical regimes and the adoption of niche innovations. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.023.
80. Mega, V. (1996). Our city, our future: towards sustainable development in European cities, Envi-ronment and Urbanization, 8(1), 133-154. https: //doi:10.1177/095624789600800111.
81. Migliore, M., D’Orso, G., Caminiti, D. (2020).The environmental benefits of carsharing: The case study of Palermo. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 2127–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.271.
82. Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G., Schure, J. T., Fox, Ch., Burkhardt, J. (2005). TCRP Report 108. Car Sharing: Where and How It Succeeds. Transportation Research Board of the National; Academies. https://doi.org/10.17226/13559.
83. Millard-Ball, A., Murray, G., ter Schure, J. Carsharing as Parking Management Strategy. In Proceed-ings of the Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting, Washington DC, USA, 1 August 2005, 1–17.
84. Moein, E., Awasthi, A. (2020). Carsharing customer demand forecasting using causal, time series and neural network methods: a case study. International Journal of Services and Operations Man-agement, 35(1), 36-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJSOM.2020.10026105.
85. Moeller, S., Wittkowski, K. (2010). The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting, Man-aging Service Quality, 20(2), 176–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09604521011027598.
86. motonews.pl, (2024). Available online: https://www.motonews.pl/auta-nowe/auto-14867-peugeot-308.html, [Accessed on: 23.05.2024].
87. Mugion, R. G., Toni, M., Di Pietro, L., Pasca, M. G., Renzi, M. F. (2019). Understanding the ante-cedents of car sharing usage: an empirical study in Italy. International Journal of Quality and Ser-vice Sciences, 11(4), 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2019-0029.
88. Muheim, P., Reinhardt, E. (1998). Car-sharing: the key to combined mobility Energy 2000. BFE Swiss Federal Office of Energy (Bern), 58–71.
89. Münzel, K., Boon, W., Frenken, K., Blomme, J., van der Linden, D. (2020). Explaining carsharing supply across Western European cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(4), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1542756.
90. Nair, R., Miller-Hooks, E. (2011). Fleet management for vehicle sharing operations. Transportation Science, 45(4), 524-540. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1100.0347.
91. Namazu, M., Mackenzie, D., Zerriffi, H., Dowlatabadi, H. (2018). Is carsharing for everyone? Un-derstanding the diffusion of carsharing servces.Transport Policy, 63(1), 189-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.12.012.
92. Nitschke, L. (2020). Reconstituting Automobility: The Influence of Non-Commercial Carsharing on the Meanings of Automobility and the Car. Sustainability, 12(17), 7062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177062.
93. Nosal, K. (2014). The state of development of carsharing systems in Poland “Carsharing - Civitet Poland Network Workshop”. Available online: https://civitas.eu/sites/default/files/documents/carsharing_w_miastach_civitas.pdf, [Accessed on: 18.04.2024].
94. Nourinejad, M., Roorda, M. (2015). Carsharing operations policies: A comparison between one-way and two-way systems. Transportation, 42(3), 97–518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9604-3.
95. Olejniczak, M., Mendakiewicz, A. (2018). Analysis of the use of car-sharing and one-person elec-tric cars in urban transportation. Different faces of logistics. A collection of student papers. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8142-085-3.16.
96. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Directorate for Finance and Enterprise, Competition Committee, Working Party 2 on Competition and Regulation, (2022). Cab, ride supply and shared ride services. Available online: https://One.Oecd.Org/Document/DAF/COMP/WP2(2018)1/En/Pdf, [Accessed on: 11.05.2024].
97. panek. CAR SHARING, (2024). How does carsharing work? Available online: https://panekcs.pl/krok-po-kroku, [Accessed on: 25.04.2024].
98. Peterson, M., Simkins, T. (2019). Consumers' processing of mindful commercial car sharing. Busi-ness Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 457–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.2221.
99. PEUGEOUT, (2024). Available online: https://www.peugeot.pl/, [Accessed on: 29.04.2024].
100. Quora, (2024). Available online: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-advantages-of-sustainable-development, [Accessed on: 17.05.2024].
101. Regional Spatial Management Office of the West Pomeranian Voivodeship, (2017). Interreg Eu-rope: National and local conditions and barriers to the development of flexible transport systems. Available online: http://rbgp.pl/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/PUB_2017_LM_Krajowe-i-regionalne_uwarunkowania.pdf, [Accessed on: 14.05.2024].
102. Repoux, M., Kaspi, M., Boyacı, B., Geroliminis, N. (2019). Dynamic prediction-based relocation policies in one-way station-based car-sharing systems with complete journey reservations. Trans-portation Research Part B: Methodological, 130, 82-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.10.004.
103. Rodenbach, J., Jeffrey, M., Chicco, A., Diana, M. (2018). Car sharing in Europe: a multidimen-sional classification and inventory, Deliverable D2.1. Available online: http://stars-h2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/STARS-D2.1.pdf, [Accessed on: 22.03.2024].
104. Roy, B. (1993). Decision Science or Decision-Aid Science? European Journal of Poerational Research, 66(2), 184-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90312-B.
105. Ruhrort, L., Steiner, J., Graff, A., Hinkeldein, D., Hoffmann, C. (2014). Carsharing with electric vehicles in the context of users’ mobility needs - Results from user-centred research from the Be-Mobility field trial (Berlin). International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 14(3/4), 286–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2014.065294.
106. Rzeńca, A., (2016). EcoCity#Environment. Sustainable, smart and participatory city development. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/7969-576-8.03.
107. Schmöller, S., Weikl, S., Müller, J., Bogenberger, K. (2015).Empirical analysis of free-floating carsharing usage: The Munich and Berlin case. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 56, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.03.008.
108. Schwabe, J. (2020). The evolution of cooperative electric carsharing in Germany and the role of intermediaries. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, 108–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.08.007.
109. Seo, J., Sheok, C. (2017).A Study on Optimizing Depot Location in Carsharing Considering the Neighborhood Environmental Factors. The Journal of The Korea Institute of Intelligent Transport, 16(5), 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.12815/kits.2017.16.5.49.
110. Shaheen, S. Cohen, A. (2016). Innovative Mobility Carsharing Outlook Winter 2016: Carsharing Market Overview, Analysis, and Trends. innovative mobility. Available online: http://innovativemobility.org/?project=innovative-mobility-carsharing-outlook-winter-2016, [Ac-cessed on: 14.05.2024].
111. Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Micheaux, H. (2015). One-way carsharing’s evolution and operator per-spectives from the Americas. Transportation, 42, 519–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9607-0.
112. Shaheen, S., Cohen, A. (2020). Innovative Mobility: Carsharing Outlook; Carsharing Market Over-wiew, Analysis and Trends. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/61q03282, [Accessed on: 27.05.2024].
113. Shaheen, S., Sperling, D., Wagner, C. (1999). A Short History of Carsharing in the 90’s. The Jour-nal of World Transport Policy & Practice, 5(3), 18–30.
114. Smart Rural Portal. Car-Sharing for Rural Areas. Available online: https://www.smartrural21.eu/smart-solution/electric-car-sharing/, [Accessed on: 05.06.2024].
115. Statista Portal, (2024). Car-Sharing. Available online: https://www.statista.com/outlook/mmo/shared-mobility/shared-rides/car-sharing/worldwide#users, [Accessed on: 19.05.2024].
116. Switch2Zero, (2024). Available online: https://www.switch2zero.com/carbon-vehicle/identify84, [Accessed on: 11.03.2024].
117. Tantau, A., Santa, A-M., I. (2021). New Energy Policy Directions in the European Union Develop-ing the Concept of Smart Cities. Smart Cities, 4, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010015.
118. Tennøy, A., Usterud Hanssen, J., Visnes Øksenholt, K. (2020).Developing a tool for assessing park-and-ride facilities in a sustainable mobility perspective. Urban, Planning and Transport Re-search,8, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2019.1690571.
119. Terama, E., Peltomaa, J., Rolim, C., Baptista, P. (2018). The Contribution of Car Sharing to the Sustainable Mobility Transition. Transfers, 8(2), 113–121. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/TRANS.2018.080207.
120. The Geography of Transport Systems, (2011). Land Use Footprint in Selected Central Areas. Available online: https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter8/urban-land-use-transportation/land-use-footprint-central-areas/, [Accessed on: 26.04.2024].
121. Tran, V., Zhao, S., Diop, E. B., Song, W. (2019). Travelers’ Acceptance of Electric Carsharing Systems in Developing Countries: The Case of China. sustainability, 11(19), 5348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195348.
122. Transport & Environment, (2023). CO2 and emissions performance of PHEV vehicles. Available online: https://www.transportenvironment.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/2023_02_TE_PHEV_Testing_2022_TU_Graz_report_final.pdf, [Ac-cessed on: 14.06.2024].
123. Turoń, K. (2022). Carsharing Vehicle Fleet Selection from the Frequent User’s Point of View. energies, 15(17), 6166. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15176166.
124. Turoń, K. (2022). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis during Selection of Vehicles for Car-Sharing Services—Regular Users’ Expectations. energies, 15(19), 7277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197277.
125. Turoń, K. (2022). Selection of Car Models with a Classic and Alternative Drive to the Car-Sharing Services from the System’s Rare Users Perspective. energies, 15(19), 6876. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15196876.
126. Turoń, K. (2023). Car-Sharing Systems in Smart Cities: A Review of the Most Important Issues Related to the Functioning of the Systems in Light of the Scientific Research. Smart Cities, 6(2), 796-808. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020038.
127. Turoń, K., Kubik, A. (2021). Business Innovations in the New Mobility Market during the COVID-19 with the Possibility of Open Business Model Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technol-ogy, Market, and Complexity,7(3), 195. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7030195.
128. Turoń, K., Kubik, A., Chen, F. (2022). What Car for Car-Sharing? Conventional, Electric, Hybrid or Hydrogen Fleet? Analysis of the Vehicle Selection Criteria for Car-Sharing Systems. energies, 15(12), 4344. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15124344.
129. United Nations, (2024). Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics. Avail-able online: https://population.un.org/wup/Download/, [Accessed on: 03.05.2024].
130. Valor, C. (2020). Anticipated emotions and resistance to innovations: the case of p2p car sharing. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37, pp. 50–65.
131. Vincke, P. (1992). Multicriteria Decision - Aid. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
132. Wang, N., Guo, J., Liu, X., Liang, Y. (2021). Electric vehicle car-sharing optimization relocation model combining user relocation and staff relocation. Transportation Letters, 13(4), 315-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2020.1728843.
133. Weikl, S., Bogenberger, K. (2015). A practice-ready relocation model for free-floating carsharing systems with electric vehicles – Mesoscopic approach and field trial results. Transportation Re-search Part C: Emerging Technologies, 57, 206–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.06.024.
134. Wieliński, G., Trepanier, M., Morency, C. (2017). Electric and hybrid car use in a free-floating carsharing system. Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 11, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1220653.
135. Wilhelms, M. P., Henkel, S., Falk, T. (2017). To earn is not enough: a means-end analysis to un-cover peer-providers' participation motives in peer-to-peer carsharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,125, 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.030.
136. Word Health Organization, (2006). Health effects and risks of transport systems: the HEARTS project. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/91102/E88772.pdf, [Accessed on:24.05.2024].
137. Xue, Y., Zhang, Y., Chen, Y. (2019). An Evaluation Framework for the Planning of Electric Car-Sharing Systems: A Combination Model of AHP-CBA-VD. sustainability, 11(20), 5627. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205627.
138. Zhang, Y., Li, L. (2020). Intention of Chinese college students to use carsharing: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior, 75, 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.09.021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Archives of Transport journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
