Application of railway microsimulation models to evaluate investment strategies for single-track railway lines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61089/aot2025.xvewz014Keywords:
railway microsimulation models, railway infrastructure, single-track line, traffic reliabilityAbstract
Railway transport in Europe is currently experiencing a surge, driven by sustainable development strategies. However, rising demand poses significant challenges for infrastructure managers, particularly regarding single-track regional lines, which often constitute system bottlenecks. This article presents a methodology for evaluating and selecting optimal infrastructure investment variants using dynamic microsimulation, addressing the problem of limited capacity and traffic instability on single-track sections. The study utilises OpenTrack software to conduct stochastic microsimulations of railway traffic. The research focuses on a case study of the Poznań – Piła railway line (No. 354) in Poland. Six infrastructure variants were defined and analysed, ranging from the "do-nothing" base scenario, through the construction of passing loops and partial double-tracking, to full double-tracking. These variants were tested under two operational scenarios: a standard periodic timetable and an intensified high-frequency timetable (with a 30-minute interval), applying random primary delays to assess system resilience. Key performance indicators included secondary delays, infrastructure occupation, and delay dispersion. The simulation results demonstrate that the base variant is highly unstable and prone to delay propagation. The study revealed that targeted point investments, such as a strategically located passing loop, can effectively reduce secondary delays by approximately 50% under moderate traffic conditions, offering a high cost-benefit ratio. However, for high-frequency services, partial double-tracking proved insufficient, as it merely shifted bottlenecks to the remaining single-track sections rather than eliminating them. Only the full double-tracking variant guaranteed system stability and reliability under heavy traffic load. The research confirms that microsimulation is an indispensable tool in the investment decision-making process, enabling the identification of potential bottlenecks that static methods often fail to capture. The findings suggest that while partial modernisation is effective for immediate relief, long-term strategies for high-frequency regional connections require comprehensive infrastructure expansion. The study provides practical recommendations for planning the development of regional railway networks to ensure operational reliability.
References
1. Aoun, J., Quaglietta, E., Goverde, R. M. P., & D’Ariano, A. (2021). A hybrid Delphi-AHP multi-criteria analysis of Moving Block and Virtual Coupling railway signalling. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 129, 103250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103250
2. Arslan, O., Reichert, M., Sellaouti, A., & Hoffmann, S. (2021). Investigation of personal rapid transit station capacities using microscopic traffic simulation. 2021 7th International Conference on Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/MT-ITS49943.2021.9529288
3. Bažant, M., & Bulíček, J. (2020). Assessment of partial double-tracked railway lines with focus on capacity. Transport Means - Proceedings of the International Conference (pp. 283–288).
4. Bešinović, N., & Goverde, R. M. P. (2018). Capacity Assessment in Railway Networks. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 268, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72153-8_2
5. Cornet, Y., Barradale, M. J., Gudmundsson, H., & Barfod, M. B. (2018). Engaging Multiple Actors in Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Project Appraisal: An application of MAMCA to the case of HS2 High-Speed Rail. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 9267306. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9267306
6. D’Acierno, L., Botte, M., & Pignatiello, G. (2019). A simulation-based approach for estimating railway capacity. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 3(3), 232–244. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V3-N3-232-244
7. Dean, M., Hickman, R., & Chen, C.-L. (2019). Testing the application of participatory MCA: The case of the South Fylde Line. Transport Policy, 73, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.007
8. Del Caro Daher, P. H., de Moura, D. F., de Morais Neto, G. C., & Leal, J. E. (2020). Sustainable Railway Solutions Using Goal Programming. Lecture Notes in Mobility, 129–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19519-9_4
9. Dick, C. T., Atanassov, I., Kippen, F. B. III, & Mussanov, D. (2019). Relative train length and the infrastructure required to mitigate delays from operating combinations of normal and over-length freight trains on single-track railway lines in North America. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 233(7), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409718809204
10. Dingler, M. H., Lai, Y.-C., & Barkan, C. P. L. (2014). Effect of train-type heterogeneity on single-track heavy haul railway line capacity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 228(8), 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713496762
11. Dunbar, R., Roberts, C., & Zhao, N. (2017). A tool for the rapid selection of a railway signalling strategy to implement train control optimisation for energy saving. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 7(4), 224–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2017.09.002
12. Florczak-Strama, M., & Parkitna, A. (2016). Project appraisal in the transport sector. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 432, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28567-2_6
13. Franke, P. (2023). Planning of railway infrastructure development in combination with the construction of an integrated periodic train timetable. WUT Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137, 133–152.
14. Gołębiowski, P. (2019). Selected Aspects of the Train Timetable Construction of Passenger Trains with the Consideration of Platform Edges and Stabling Tracks Allocation Problem. Logistics and Transport, 41, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.26411/83-1734-2015-1-41-11-19
15. Gołębiowski, P. (2022). Risk assessment in railway traffic planning - assumptions for the method. WUT Journal of Transportation Engineering, 134, 109–123. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.3272
16. Gołębiowski, P., Jacyna, M., & Stańczak, A. (2021). The Assessment of Energy Efficiency versus Planning of Rail Freight Traffic. A Case Study on the Example of Poland. Energies, 14(18), 5629. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14185629
17. Gołębiowski, P., & Kukulski, J. (2020). Preliminary study of shaping the railway track geometry in terms of their maintenance costs and capacity. Archives of Transport, 53, 115–128. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1787
18. Grimm, M. (2012). The analysis of congested infrastructure and capacity utilisation at trafikverket. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 127, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.2495/CR120301
19. Gühnemann, A., Laird, J. J., & Pearman, A. D. (2012). Combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria analysis to prioritise a national road infrastructure programme. Transport Policy, 23, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.005
20. Hickman, R., & Dean, M. (2018). Incomplete cost–incomplete benefit analysis in transport appraisal. Transport Reviews, 38(6), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1407377
21. Hong, H. (2023). Research on key bottlenecks and solutions for improving transport capacity of existing urban rail transit lines. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 12626, 126260Z. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2674280
22. Huang, Z., Xu, H., & Chen, J. (2022). Simulation and Verification System Design for High Speed Railway Based on OpenTrack Secondary Development. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 12081, 120812U. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2623975
23. Jacyna, M. (2022). Wspomaganie decyzji w praktyce inżynierskiej: metody, algorytmy, przykłady. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
24. Jamili, A. (2018). Computation of practical capacity in single-track railway lines based on computing the minimum buffer times. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 8(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2018.03.002
25. Kettner, M., Sewcyk, B., & Hunold, J. (2004). Interlinking micro- and macroscopic railway traffic simulation models. Eisenbahningenieur, 55(2), 6–11.
26. Khadem Sameni, M., & Moradi, A. (2022). Railway capacity: A review of analysis methods. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 24, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2022.100357
27. Khadem-Sameni, M., Landex, A., & Preston, J. (2010). Revising the UIC 406 method: Revenue generating capacity. Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference 2010, 2, 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1115/JRC2010-36281
28. Khaki, A. M., & Shafiyi, S. M. (2011). Comparison between the output of Cost Benefit Analysis and Multi-Criteria Analysis in Urban Transportation Investments. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(11), 667–677.
29. Kovari, B., Balogh, C. L., & Aradi, S. (2023). Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for railway rescheduling. SACI 2023 - IEEE 17th International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics, Proceedings, 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1109/SACI58269.2023.10158653
30. Krzykawski, M., Burdzik, R., & Gołębiowski, P. (2024). Assumptions for the mathematical model investigating the effect of railway line route parameters on the average speed of railway vehicles. WUT Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.7732
31. Landex, A., Schittenhelm, B., Kaas, A. H., & Schneider-Tilli, J. (2008). Capacity measurement with the UIC 406 capacity method. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 103, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.2495/CR080061
32. Licciardello, R., Adamko, N., Deleplanque, S., & Ricci, S. (2020). Integrating yards, network and optimisation models towards real-time rail freight yard operations. Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 75(6), 417–447.
33. Lindner, T. (2009). Recommendations for enhancing UIC Code 406 problems, solution possibilities and limits arising by the application of an analytical compression method for doing capacity research. ZEVrail, 133(11-12), 510–519.
34. Lindner, T. (2011). Applicability of the analytical compression method for doing node capacity evaluations [Anwendbarkeit des Analytischen Kompressions-Verfahrens zur Leistungsuntersuchung von Knotenpunkten]. ZEVrail, 135(3), 76–81.
35. Ľupták, V., Dedík, M., Morihladko, P., Šulko, P., & Pečený, L. (2025). Assessment of the Railway Line Capacity on the Railway Network Using a New Innovative Method. Sustainability, 17(10), 4476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104476
36. Mátrai, T. (2013). Cost benefit analysis and ex-post evaluation for railway upgrade projects. Periodica Polytechnica Transportation Engineering, 41(1), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPtr.7102
37. Matowicki, M., Młyńczak, J., Gołębiowski, P., & Přikryl, J. (2025). Defining Railway Traffic Conflicts and Optimising Their Resolution: A Machine Learning Perspective. Transactions on Transport Sciences, 16, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.5507/tots.2025.010
38. Nehring, K., Kłodawski, M., Jachimowski, R., Klimek, P., & Vasek, R. (2021). Simulation analysis of the impact of container wagon pin configuration on the train loading time in the intermodal terminal. Archives of Transport, 60, 155–169. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6928
39. Nikolayzik, D., Maus, M., & Nießen, N. (2024). Investigation of Railway Network Capacity by Means of Dynamic Flows. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(18), 8233. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188233
40. Panek, A., Jacyna, M., Jachimowski, R., & Szczepański, E. (2025). Reliability and efficiency in technology selection in logistics facilities – multi-criteria decision support using the AHP method. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność – Maintenance and Reliability, 27, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein/200684
41. Pascariu, B., Coviello, N., & D'Ariano, A. (2021). Railway freight node capacity evaluation: A timetable-saturation approach and its application to the Novara freight terminal. Transportation Research Procedia, 52, 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.017
42. Penyalver, D., & Turró, M. (2018). A classification for the redistributive effects of investments in transport infrastructure. International Journal of Transport Economics, 45(4), 695–732. https://doi.org/10.19272/201806704008
43. PKP Polskie Linie Kolejowe S.A. (2024). Regulamin sieci 2024/2025. https://www.plk-sa.pl/klienci-i-kontrahenci/warunki-udostepniania-infrastruktury-i-regulaminy/regulamin-sieci/regulamin-sieci-2024/2025
44. Prencipe, F. P., & Petrelli, M. (2018). Analytical methods and simulation approaches for determining the capacity of the Rome-Florence "direttissima" line. Ingegneria Ferroviaria, 73(7-8), 599–633.
45. Rahoma, D. M. S., Heikal, A. Z., Zohny, H. N., & Kotb, A. S. (2021). Proposed models to calculate and optimise line capacity under different operation conditions for egyptian railway network. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 19(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-27821
46. Rakhmangulov, A., Sładkowski, A., Osintsev, N., Mishkurov, P., & Muravev, D. (2017). Dynamic optimization of railcar traffic volumes at railway nodes. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 87, 405–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51502-1_10
47. Shih, M.-C., Dick, C. T., Sogin, S. L., & Barkan, C. R. L. (2014). Comparison of capacity expansion strategies for single-track railway lines with sparse sidings. Transportation Research Record, 2448, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.3141/2448-07
48. Sogin, S., Lai, Y.-C., Dick, C., & Barkan, C. (2013). Comparison of capacity of single- and double-track rail lines. Transportation Research Record, 2374, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-13
49. Szczepański, E., Gołębiowski, P., & Kondracka, B. (2023). Evaluation of the technological process of wagon processing at shunting stations using the simulation model. Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport - Politechnika Śląska, 120, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.20858/sjsutst.2023.120.16
50. Szczepański, E., Jacyna, M., Jachimowski, R., Rostia, V., & Nehring, K. (2021). Decision support for the intermodal terminal layout designing. Archives of Civil Engineering, 67, 611–630. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2021.137188
51. TransInfo. (n.d.). Historia linii Poznań – Piła. https://web.archive.org/web/20230804191008/https://transinfo.pl/inforail/historia-linii-poznan-pila/
52. Tudela, A., Akiki, N., & Cisternas, R. (2006). Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: An application to urban transport investment. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(5), 414–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.002
53. Wang, H., Zhao, N., & Chen, L. (2015). An integrated capacity evaluation method for CBTC- system-equipped urban rail lines. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 229(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409713511448
54. Wang, Y., & Zhang, X. (2014). Research on Transport Capacity of Urban Rail Transit Based on Railsys. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 288, 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-53751-6_23
55. Weik, N., Warg, J., Johansson, I., Bohlin, M., & Nießen, N. (2020). Extending UIC 406-based capacity analysis – New approaches for railway nodes and network effects. Journal of Rail Transport Planning and Management, 15, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrtpm.2020.100199
56. Wikipedia. (2025). Linia kolejowa nr 354. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linia_kolejowa_nr_354
57. Wojnar, G., & Irlik, M. (2022). Multicriteria train running model and simulator for railway capacity assessment. Transport Problems, 17(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.20858/tp.2022.17.2.17
58. Yücel, N., & Taşabat, S. E. (2019). The Selection of Railway System Projects with Multi Creteria Decision Making Methods: A Case Study for Istanbul. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.066
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Archives of Transport journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
