Simulation and Comparison of Two Fusion Methods for Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Estimation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.6161

Keywords:

traffic engineering

Abstract

Accurate estimation of macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) is the precondition of MFD’s application. At present, there are two traditional estimation methods of road network’s MFD, such as the loop detector data (LDD) estimation method and the floating car data (FCD) estimation method, but there are limitations in both traditional estimation methods. In order to improve the accuracy of road network MFD estimation, a few scholars have studied the fusion method of road network MFD estimation, but there are still some shortcomings on the whole. However, based on the research of adaptive weighted averaging (AWA) fusion method for MFD estimation of road network, I propose to use the MFD’s two parameters of road network obtained by LDD estimation method and FCD estimation method, and establish a back-propagation neural network data fusion model for MFD parameters of road network (BPNN estimation fusion method), and then the micro-traffic simulation model of connected-vehicle network based on Vissim software is established by taking the intersection group of the core road network in Tianhe District of Guangzhou as the simulation experimental area, finally, compared and analyzed two MFD estimation fusion methods of road network, in order to determine the best MFD estimation fusion method of road network. The results show that the mean absolute percent error (MAPE) of the parameters of road network’s MFD and the average absolute values of difference values of the state ratio of road network’s MFD are both the smallest after BPNN estimation fusion, which is the closest to the standard MFD of road network. It can be seen that the result of BPNN estimation fusion method is better than that of AWA estimation fusion method, which can improve the accuracy of road network MFD estimation effectively.

References

AMBÜHL, L., & MENENDEZ, M., 2016. Data fusion algorithm for macroscopic fundamental diagram estimation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 184-197.

COURBON, T., & LECLERCQ, L., 2011. Cross-comparison of macroscopic fundamental diagram estimation methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 417-426.

DAGANZO, C. F., 2007. Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(1), 49-62.

DAGANZO, C. F., GAYAH, V. V., & GON-ZALES, E. J., 2011. Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multi-valuedness and instability. Transportation Re-search Part B: Methodological, 45(1), 278-288.

DU, J., RAKHA, H., & GAYAH, V. V., 2016. Deriving macroscopic fundamental diagrams from probe data: Issues and proposed solutions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 66, 136-149.

EDIE, L. C., 1963. Discussion of traffic stream measurements and definitions in Almond, J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, 139-154.

GAYAH, V. V., & DAGANZO, C. F., 2011. Clockwise hysteresis loops in the macroscopic fundamental diagram: an effect of network in-stability. Transportation Research Part B: Met-hodological, 45(4), 643-655.

GEROLIMINIS, N., & DAGANZO, C. F., 2008. Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42(9), 759-770.

GEROLIMINIS, N., & SUN, J., 2011. Proper-ties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(3), 605-617.

GODFREY, J. W. (1969). The mechanism of a road network. Traffic Engineering & Control, 8(8), 323-327.

GONZALES, E. J., CHAVIS, C., LI, Y., & DA-GANZO, C. F., 2009. Multimodal transport modeling for Nairobi, Kenya: insights and recommendations with an evidence-based model. UC Berkeley, Volvo Working Paper UCB-ITS-VWP-2009-5.

JIN, S., SHEN, L. X., & HE, Z. B., 2018. Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Model of Urban Network Based on Multi-source Data Fusion. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 18(2), 108-115+127.

LECLERCQ, L., CHIABAUT, N., & TRINQUIER, B., 2014. Macroscopic fundamental diagrams: A cross-comparison of estimation methods. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 62, 1-12.

LIN, X. H., & XU, J. M., 2018. Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Estimation Fusion Method of Road Networks Based on Adaptive Weighted Average. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 18(6), 102-109.

LIN, X., 2019. A Road Network Traffic State Identification Method Based on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram and Spectral Clustering and Support Vector Machine. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019(1), 1-10.

LU, S., JIE, W., ZUYLEN, H. V., LIU, X., 2013. Deriving the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram for an urban area using counted flows and taxi GPS. International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 184-188.

MA, J. L., 2017. Study on data fusion and state identification technology of urban traffic. Peole’s Public Security University of China.

NAGLE, A. S., & GAYAH, V. V., 2013. A method to estimate the macroscopic fundamental diagram using limited mobile probe data. In 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013) (pp. 1987-1992). IEEE.

NAGLE, A. S., & GAYAH, V. V., 2014. Accuracy of networkwide traffic states estimated from mobile probe data. Transportation Research Record, 2421(1), 1-11.

ZHANG, S. C., ZHU, Y., & CHEN, X. Q., 2018. Characteristic of macroscopic fundamental diagrams based on mobile sensing data. Journal of ZheJiang University (Engineering Science), 52(7), 1338-1344.

ŻOCHOWSKA, R., 2014. Selected issues in modelling of traffic flows in congested urban networks. Archives of Transport, 29(1), 77-89.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

LIN, X., XU, J., & CAO, C. (2019). Simulation and Comparison of Two Fusion Methods for Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Estimation. Archives of Transport, 51(3), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.6161

Share

Similar Articles

101-110 of 283

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.