The effect of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind

Zihao Xie; Zhenfeng Wu; Longhui Zhu; Wangcai Ding

doi:10.5604/01.3001.0015.0093

Authors

Zihao Xie School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9211-195X
Zhenfeng Wu School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-4703
Longhui Zhu School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8129-4703
Wangcai Ding School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-6008

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0093

Keywords:

freight train, train marshalling, crosswind, aerodynamic drag, lateral force

Abstract

Different types and quantities of freight cars will affect the marshalling forms of freight trains. In order to investigate the influence of the marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of freight trains under crosswind, three types of freight cars such as box cars, gondola cars and tank cars, were selected to marshal with locomotives. This paper used Detached Eddy Simulation method (DES) based on the SST k-ω turbulent model to simulate the aerodynamic performance of the freight train under crosswind. The wind speed, wind angle and train running speed were set as 25m/s, 45° and 100km/h respectively. The influence of different marshalling forms on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train such as aerodynamic drag and lateral force were calculated and compared. The results showed that the marshalling forms have significant effect on the aerodynamic drag and the maximum difference of the aerodynamic drag can reach 20.5%. Furthermore, the variations of the lateral force of the whole train and the locomotive are not apparent. The maximum difference is only 4.3% and 4.1% respectively. However, the changes of marshalling forms have obvious influence on the lateral force of each carriage. The maximum difference of the lateral force of the box car, gondola car and tank car is 17%, 20.1% and 24.1% respectively. The essential reason why the marshalling forms has a significant impact on the aerodynamic performance of the freight train is that there are obvious differences in the volume and shape structure of each railway carriage. The large volume of box cars and the cavity structure of gondola cars make their position a key factor affecting the aerodynamic performance of freight trains. Among the six different marshalling forms selected in this paper, the best marshalling form is: locomotive--gondola car--box car--tank car. Both the aerodynamic drag of the train and the lateral force of the boxcar are the smallest by taking this marshalling form.

References

Baker, C. (2010). The flow around high speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 98, 277–298.

Chen Z., Liu T., Jiang Z., et al. (2018). Comparative analysis of the effect of different nose lengths on train aerodynamic performance under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 78, 69-85.

Cheli F., Ripamonti F., Rocchi D., et al. (2010). Aerodynamic behaviour investigation of the new EMUV250 train to cross wind. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 98, 189–201.

Flynn D., Hemida H., Soper D., et al. (2014). Detached-eddy simulation of the slipstream of an operational freight train. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 132, 1-12.

Flynn D., Hemida H., Baker C., (2016). On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 156, 14-28.

Gao G., Tian H., Yao S., et al. (2004). Effect of strong cross-wind on the stability of trains running on the Lanzhou-Xinjiang railway line. Journal of China Railway Society, 26(4), 36-40 [in Chinese].

Huo S., Liu T., Yu M., et al. (2020). Impact of the trailing edge shape of a downstream dummy vehicle on train aerodynamics subjected to crosswind. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 0(0), 1–14.

Hemida H., Krajnović S., (2010). LES study of the influence of the nose shape and yaw angles on flow structures around trains. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 98, 34-46.

Krajnović S., Ringqvist P., Nakade K., et al. (2012). Large eddy simulation of the flow around a simplified train moving through a crosswind flow. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 110, 86-99.

Liu D., Wang T., Liang X., et al. (2020). High-speed train overturning safety under varying wind speed conditions. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 198, 104111.

Mao J, Ma X., Xi Y., (2011). Research on the running stability of high-speed trains under the cross wind by means of simulation. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 35(1), 44-48+53 [in Chinese].

Niu J., Zhou D., Wang Y., (2018). Numerical comparison of aerodynamic performance of stationary and moving trains with or without windbreak wall under crosswind. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 182, 1-15.

Niu J., Zhou D., Liu T., et al. (2017). Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance of a couple multiple units high-speed train. Vehicle System Dynamics, 55(5), 681-703.

Östh J., Krajnović S., (2014). A study of the aerodynamics of a generic container freight wagon using Large-Eddy Simulation. Journal of Wind Engineering & Industrial Aerodynamics, 44, 31-51.

Sterling M., Baker C., Jordan S., et al. (2008). A study of the slipstreams of high-speed passenger trains and freight trains. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 222, 177-193.

Sima M., Eichinger S., Blanco A., et al. (2015). Computational fluid dynamics simulation of rail vehicles in crosswind: Application in norms and standards. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 229(6), 635-643.

Wu, Z., Yang, E., Ding, W., (2017). Design of large-scale streamlined head cars of high-speed trains and aerodynamic drag calculation. Archives of Transport, 44(4), 89-97.

Wu, Z., Huo, Y., Ding, W., et al., (2018). Bionic shape design of electric locomotive and aerodynamic drag reduction. Archives of Transport, 48(4), 99-109.

Wang Z., Li T., Zhang J., (2018). Research on aerodynamic performance of high-speed train subjected to different types of crosswind. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 54(4), 203-211 [in Chinese].

Xi Y., Mao J., Gao L., et al. (2015). Aerodynamic force/moment for high-speed train in crosswind field based on DES. Journal of Central South University, 46(3), 1129-1139 [in Chinese].

Xiong X., Liang X., Jin Q., (2015). Numerical simulation of aerodynamic force on tarpaulin of railway vehicle under cross wind condition. Journal of Central South University, 46(2), 728-735 [in Chinese].

Yang Z., Ma J., Chen Y., et al. (2010). The Unsteady Aerodynamic Characteristics of a High-speed Train in Different Operating Conditions under Cross Wind. Journal of China Railway Society, 32(2), 18-23 [in Chinese].

Zhou D., Tian H., Yang M., et al. (2007). Comparison of aerodynamic performance of different kinds of wagons running on embankment of the Qinghai Tibet railway under strong cross wind. Journal of China Railway Society, 29(5), 32-36 [in Chinese].