Airline service quality evaluation for Indonesian low-cost carriers based on Extenics innovation theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8794

Keywords:

airline indonesian, Low-Cost Carriers, LCC, service quality, modified AIRQUAL, Extenics theory

Abstract

Nowadays, the market is getting competitive in all aspects of the survival of the company. Companies, especially in the service industry, realize that in order to win the market, they need to explore new ways of delighting customers. The airline industry has played a vital role in Indonesia's modern development and competitiveness. Fierce competition and shrinking profits have impelled the airlines to stress upon improving the quality of the services being provided to the passengers. Passengers have become very specific about their service needs and often tend to shift to others that provide better services. Service quality has emerged as a critical consideration for airlines in the competitive global market, coinciding with Low-Cost Carriers' rapid proliferation (LCCs), bringing a paradigm shift in airline business strategy. Twenty-five service quality attributes identified through extensive literature review and results obtained through five modified AIRQUAL dimensions are fruitful for airline managers to address service quality issues. This paper aims to evaluate LCCs’ service quality in Indonesia using the Extenics innovation theory. The Extenics innovation theory is a kind of method with the combination of formalization, quantification, and logicalization. It is effectively applied to put forward creative ideas of new services of airlines. The concepts and principles of service attributes classification based on Extenics are also discussed. To consider interdependence and to calculate the relative importance of each criterion, the AHP method is applied. The study demonstrates and signifies that the Extenics theory and AHP method are promising and pragmatic evaluation model for customer-oriented airline strategic planning. This study has a number of practical implications for LCC airlines, its policy makers and managers. Findings of this study suggest that LCC airlines should focus on appropriate strategies for improving their customers’ satisfaction. Airlines should concern on service failures such as delays by providing extra customer care to supplement required material compensation and provide valuable objective feedback and information. A theoretical implication of this study is that Extenics innovation theory can classify and prioritize the service attributes of airlines. Further, the scope of future research works has been discussed at the end to conclude the paper.

References

AKAA, O., ABU, A., SPEARPOINT, M., GIOVINAZZI, S., 2016. Decision analysis of stakeholder views in the design of steel structures in fire. International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, 523-532.

ALI, F., DEY, B.L., FILIERI, R., 2015. An assessment of service quality and resulting customer satisfaction in Pakistan International Airlines: findings from foreigners and overseas Pakistani customers. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 32, 486–502.

ALOTAIBI, M.M., 2015. Evaluation of “AIRQUAL” Scale for Measuring Airline Service Quality and its Effect on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty. Cranfield: Cranfield University.

BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK. Berita Resmi Statistik. Perkembangan Transportasi Nasional Desember 2016. Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia.

BARI, S.B., 2001. AIRQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Service Quality, Customer Satisfaction, and Repurchase Intention. School of Tourism and Hospitality Management. Gazimagusa: Eastern Mediterranean University.

BUAPHIBAN, T., TRUONG, D., 2017. Evaluation of passengers' buying behaviors toward low cost carriers in Southeast Asia. Journal of Air Transport Management, 59, 124–133.

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, 2017. The World Factbook. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from Central Inteligence Agency: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/id.html.

CRESWELL, J.W., 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE.

CVETKOSKA, V., REDZEP, N.B., 2016. Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process to rank city branches. XV International Symposium Symorg (pp. 241-252). Zlatibor: Faculty of Organizational Science, University of Beigarde.

DATABOKS, 2016. 20 Profesi Warga Jakarta, Apa yang Dominan? Retrieved December 17, 2017, from Databoks (2016, September 8), Katadata: News and Research: https://databoks .katadata.co.id/datapublish/2016/09/08/26-persen-warga-jakarta-bekerja-sebagai-karyawan.

EKIZ, H. E., HUSSAIN, K., BAVIK, A., 2006. Perceptions of service quality in North Cyprus National Airline. 18th Biennial International Congress: New Trends in Tourism and Hospitality Management. 03-05, 778-790. Croatia: Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.

FAROOQ, M. S., SALAM, M., FAYOLLE, A., JAAFAR, N., AYUPP, K., 2018. Impact of service quality on customer satisfaction in Malaysia airlines: A PLS-SEM approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 67, 169–180.

FU, Y., EBOLI, L., MAZZULLA, G., ZHANG, Y., 2017. Railway service quality in Northern Italy: A multilevel synthetic assessment. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 9, 1-12.

GANIYU, R.A., 2017. Customer satisfaction and loyalty: a study of interrelationships and effects in Nigerian domestic airline industry. Oradea Journal of Business and Economics, 2(1), 7–20.

GAZEM, N., RAHMAN, A.A., 2014. Interpretation of TRIZ principles in a service related context. Asian Social Science, 10(13), 108-130.

GHORABAEE, M.K., AMIRI, M., ZAVADSKAS, E.K., TURSKIS, Z., ANTUCHEVICIENE, J., 2017. A new hybrid simulation-based assignment approach for evaluating airlines with multiple service quality criteria. Journal of Air Transport Management, 63, 45-60.

GUPTA, H., 2018. Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 35–47.

HEIMLICH, J. P., JACKSON, C., 2017. Air Travelers in America: Survey Highlights. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from Airlines for America: We connect the world (2017, February 28): http://airlines.org/wp-content/up-loads/2017/02/Heimlich-AirTravelSurvey-FINAL-28Feb2017.pdf.

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION. (2018, October). IATA Forecast Predicts 8.2 billion Air Travelers in 2037. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from IATA: https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/pr/2018-10 -24-02/.

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION, 2020. 20 Year Passenger Forecast. Retrieved October 20, 2020, from IATA: https://www.iata.org/en/publications/store/20-year-passenger-forecast/.

JEERADIST, T., THAWESAENGSKUL-THAI, N., SANGSUWAN, T., 2016. Using TRIZ to enhance passengers' perceptions of an airline’s image through service quality and safety. Journal of Air Transport Management, 53, 131-139.

KIERZKOWSKI, A., KISIEL.T, PAWLAK, M., 2018. Passenger level of service estimation model for queuing systems at the airport. Archives of Transport, 47(3), 29-38.

LI, W.H., YU, S.H., PEI, H.N., ZHAO, C., TIAN, B.Z., 2017. A hybrid approach based on fuzzy AHP and 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic method for evaluation in-flight service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 60, 49-64.

LIU, Y., ECKERT, C.M., EARL, C., 2020. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113738.

MUNOZ, C., LANIADO, H., CORDOBA, J., 2020. Airline choice model for an international round-trip flight considering outbound and re-turn flight schedules. Archives of Transport, 54(2), 75-93.

NADIRI, H., HUSSAIN, K., EKIZ, E.H., ERDOĞAN, Ş., 2008. An investigation on the factors influencing passengers’ loyalty in the North Cyprus national airline. TQM Journal, 20, 265–280.

NASIEF, K., 2017. Hiring Mystery Shoppers for Airlines. Retrieved December 17, 2017, from Measure CP: https://measurecp.com/hiring-mystery-shoppers-for-airlines/.

PAN, J.Y., TRUONG, D., 2018. Passengers’ intentions to use low-cost carriers: An extended theory of planned behavior model. Journal of Air Transport Management, 69, 38–48.

PARASURAMAN, A., ZEITHAML, V.A., BERRY, L.L., 1988. SERVQUAL: A multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.

PARK, E., JANG, Y., KIM, J., JEONG, N. J., BAE, K., DEL POBIL, A.P., 2019. Determinants of customer satisfaction with airline services: An analysis of customer feedback big data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, 186–190.

PARK, S., LEE, J.S., NICOLAU, J.L., 2020. Understanding the dynamics of the quality of airline service attributes: Satisfiers and dissatisfiers. Tourism Management, 81, 104163.

PERÇIN, S., 2018. Evaluating airline service quality using combined fuzzy decision-making approach. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 48-60.

PODVEZKO, V., SIVILEVICIUS, H., PODVEZKO, A., 2014. Scientific application of the AHP method in transport problems. Archives of Transport, 29(1), 47-54.

POMEROL, J.C., BARBA-ROMERO, S., 2000. Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice. New York: Springer Science Business Media.

PUNEL, A., AL HAJJ HASSAN, L., ERMAGUN, A., 2019. Variations in airline passenger expectation of service quality across the globe. Tourism Management, 75, 491- 508.

QIAN, L., 2016. Logistics service quality evaluation for e-commerce based on extenics theory. International Journal of Simulation Systems, Science, & Technology, 17(2), 201-206.

REN, J., MANZARDO, A., TONIOLO, S., SCIPIONI, A., 2013. Sustainability of hydrogen supply chain. part ii : prioritizing and classifying the sustainability of hydrogen supply chains based on the combination of extension theory and AHP. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38, 13845-13855.

SHAH, F. T., SYED, Z., IMAM, A., RAZA, A., 2020. The impact of airline service quality on passengers’ behavioral intentions using passenger satisfaction as a mediator. Journal of Air Transport Management, 85, 101815.

SPICER, R., 2018. Driven by competition, the airline industry is taking off. Aviationpros retrieved on July 20, 2020. https://www.aviation pros.com/airlines/artcle/12419680/driven-by-competition-the-airline-industry-is-taking-off.

SUKWADI, R., 2015. Utilizing Customer Experience Management framework to create a delightful service experience. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 6(1), 29-42.

SUKWADI, R., MUAFI, SANJAYA, H.P., 2018. Incorporating Kansei Engineering into service quality tools to improve the Airline ser-vices. International Journal for Quality Research, 12(2), 297-316.

SUKWADI, R., YANG, C.C., 2014. Determining service improvement priority in a zoological park. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 7(1), 1-20.

SUKWADI, R., YANG, C.C., FAN, L., 2012. Capturing customer value creation based on service experience - A case study on News Café. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers, 29(6), 383-399.

TAHANISAZ, S., SHOKUHYAR, S., 2020. Evaluation of passenger satisfaction with service quality: A consecutive method applied to the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 83, 101764.

TRUONG, D., PAN, J.Y., BUAPHIBAN, T., 2020. Low cost carriers in Southeast Asia: How does ticket price change the way passengers make their airline selection? Journal of Air Transport Management, 86, 101836.

VOGT, W.P., JOHNSON, R.B., 2011. Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology. SAGE.

YANG, J., GAO, H., LIU, W., 2012. Evaluation of land grading based on extenics theory. IEEE 2nd Int. Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems, 1263-1266. Dalian: IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

Issue

Section

Original articles

How to Cite

Sukwadi, R., Susanto, A., & Liang, Y.-C. (2021). Airline service quality evaluation for Indonesian low-cost carriers based on Extenics innovation theory. Archives of Transport, 58(2), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8794

Share

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>